I came across this film while scrolling through social media. The small snippet of the film’s opening was something that really drew me in. During the opening scene, Suzie Salmon, reveals her everyday life and how she saved her brother. Not only does this dramatic scene drag you in but the plot twist voiceover of Suzie stating her name and defining herself as the girl who died at 14 really leaves you as an audience member wanting to watch more in order to discover what happened to her. Overall the narrative was by far my favourite element of the film. This was purely due to the fact that they decided to use a non linearapproach to the story by presenting the killer to the audience at the beginning and then showing how the other characters begin to unravel the murder and find out who did it. As well as this, I loved the ending as they didn’t actually catch the man who killed Suzie but instead showed him dying in an accident that was linked symbolically to Suzie’s afterlife. I felt this really added a creative element to the narrative and the way the story was portrayed.

Editing and scene transitions was also something that really stood out throughout this film in my opinion. For example, during the moment where Suzie is taken into the underground hideout, the film from this point uses hidden scene cuts to help create the feeling of sinking into the floor and adding more of a sinister effect to the scene. Another editing style I liked about this film was the style used to show her death. The film showed Suzie escaping from the bunker and running home however on approach to her family and house etc it becomes clearer that no one can see or hear her and instead she appears to be a spirit. I loved how these moments in the film were shot. The use of colour grading techniques to create a subtle difference between the warmth of living and coldness of where Suzie is stuck. As the film continues Suzie is shown moving back and forth between her previous life and heaven. This limbo is cleverly shown through the beautiful graphics of Suzie’s thoughts and this small world she seems to be stuck in as she tries to get justice for her family.
Overall, I felt this film had a really gripping narrative and had an unexpected ending than typical murder films. I loved the way Peter Jackson and the rest of the film’s producers really helped portray the books in a dramatic and intriguing way. The overall editing of this film I felt was good and the transitions between shots as well as the camera movements, such as the birds eye pan, giving the emphasise of death and floating/ looking down, really worked to pull the story together and reflect how the narration of Suzie was feeling during certain moments within the film. One thing I would change about this film would possible be the murder, the sense of mystery behind the act is interesting however I felt it should have been revealed later in the film, possibly during a flash back.

him, when she grips her teddy bear and the use of star stickers in her room. All of these helped to reflect how she is at the age where she should start to think about love and childish dreams instead of the situation she is in. I felt this really helped to increase the emotional impact of the film. The plot of teenage pregnancy is something often done in short films and can sometimes be predictable however I felt that this films twist ending, and overall delivery of the plot really made the film unique. The film opens with a bird’s eye pan of Mishka on her bed, I felt this really helped to grip me as a viewer. Throughout, the film’s cinematography is amazing. I could sense that every shot used was thought through and had a meaning.
Escape rooms are something that I enjoy. I love puzzles and after watching the trailers for this escape room film I was intrigued into how they were going to recreate the fun and thrill of being able to figure out an escape room and combine it with a horror/thriller genre. Of course, it was predictable that they were going to follow the style of films such as ‘would you rather?’ where there is a higher power watching the drama unravel for their own amusement. Disregarding the predictability of the films style choice and plot ending the overall narrative of the film was interesting and intriguing. One thing I did not like about the film’s narrative was the use of a nonlinear timeline, opening with the final contestant trying to escape the final room felt more like a spoiler for the end instead of the obvious intent of creating a gripping opening for the audience.
One of the best things about this film is the acting by James McAvoy. Throughout the film he is constantly showing the range and dynamics of all the different personalities in a clear and noticeable way. From his change in voice to the way he carries his body as the character is amazing. The choice of personalities is clearly well thought through to allow humour at moments within the film. Hedwig, in my opinion, is one character who really draws out the comedic elements within the film. The idea of a fully-grown man having the perspective and thought process of a nine-year-old forever not only creates an interesting and intriguing moment but also adds humour as the juxtaposition between the acting and the actor create a sensation the audience have not experienced or witnessed before. On top of the acting emphasising the films impact, the lighting throughout created a strange atmosphere. A normal thriller would be done with a lower toned lighting creating depth and shadow however, this film was done with lighting that was clinical and very similar throughout with little change. Until the end during the beast’s arrival. I felt this was a further indication towards the acting and helped to add more focus on Kevin as well as evoking the concept of him being a normal person in some ways.